 |
||||||||
Organizational Effectiveness Through Feedback Management
|
||||||||
|
>> Pay-to-Play Laws: Good Government or Speech Infringement
|
||||||||
Review our
Read our latest article on
and see how a misalignment between a survey invitation and the actual survey.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Learn how to conduct a survey project from questionnaire design
to survey administration
to data analysis.
 June 19-21, 2012 Wash. DCJuly 10-12, 2012 DubaiNov. 13-14, 2012, Chicago~~~
TBD~~~
Learn how to design a
TBD
~~~
View a short online presentation
summarizing the concept of surveying and outlining our courses.
|
||
Provides targeted assistance on your survey questionnaire and project while being mentored on good survey practices.
|
||
 Contract Holder GS-02F-0126U
|
||
Need more than
targeted survey consulting?
Great Brook specializes in
the design and execution of
Custom Survey Research Projects to meet
your individual needs.
|
||
Get an expert's review of the feedback management processes in your organization for customers or other stakeholder groups --
or get a deep dive assessment of your survey program.
|
||
|
||
Have a question about surveying you'd like to have answered in a future newsletter article?
Please contact us.
|
||
Self-help guidance for your survey project
 |
||
Private On-site
Survey Workshops
are available at your company. This may prove more cost effective and deliver immediate value to your survey program as we build your survey instrument in class.
Please contact us for details.
|
||
For a comprehensive list
of survey automation tools
for your survey program.
|
Summary. Are pay-to-play laws meant to protect us against kickbacks in government contracts, but are they an unwarranted attack on First Amendment freedom of speech?
While I normally stay on the topic of feedback management and related topics, I recently was forwarded an email that should concern all of you who are Americans. (No offense to my international friends, but you still may find this interesting.) And some of you no doubt will disagree with me or think my concerns are overblown.
My wife works for a large corporation, and it sent an email to all employees about the ramifications of so-called “pay-to-play” laws that many states and municipalities have adopted. To quote the key section:
These laws restrict [companies] and, in some instances, its employees and members of its Board of Directors, from making monetary and in-kind (including donated labor, materials, and services) political contributions to, or soliciting such contributions on behalf of, candidates for certain elected offices, political party committees and other political committees (e.g., PACs). Some of these laws prohibit [companies] from entering into a government contract for a certain number of years if [the company], an employee, or a member of the Board makes or solicits a “covered contribution.”
Depending on the jurisdiction, the law may even cover certain family members (such as spouses and children) of [company] employees or Board members. Violating these requirements may lead to civil and, under certain circumstances, criminal liability.
Accordingly, [the company] is requiring all employees and members of the Board of Directors to pre-clear certain personal political contributions in the jurisdictions that have "pay-to-play" laws.
The ostensible goal is to avoid kickbacks to get government contracts. In the age of Blagojevich, pay-to-play concerns are real. In my home state of Massachusetts our previous Speaker of the House is now serving time for steering state business to a company; however, no campaign contributions appear to have been involved.
One aspect of many of these laws is to make public large contributions from business leaders, which is required by law even for PACs. But these laws may intimidate some, in essence negating the Supreme Court Citizens United decision. Strong arguments can be made about whether the unintended consequences outweigh the positives.
But consider the broad scope of this crop of laws. My wife is a mid-level software engineering manager. She has no direct contact with customers and is far removed from any sales processes. Our state is not in an affected jurisdiction (yet), but what if we were. If I wanted to make a $100 donation to a candidate, make phone calls on his/her behalf, or even to hold a sign at a rally, I would have to get clearance from corporate legal.
I guess the good thing is that this legislation has spawned a new compliance industry and is creating jobs for lawyers. But at what cost?
I want to say this is absurd, despite the ostensible clean government goals, but the sweeping scope actually makes these laws chilling attacks on First Amendment freedom of speech rights. Why should I have to get approval to exercise my First Amendment rights? Imagine someone getting fired because his/her spouse attended a political rally holding signs for a candidate. Imagine the mischief that can be raised as the anti-business crowd seeks to find companies that are not in compliance.
It's just wrong.
Regardless of political affiliation, we should all be concerned.
Want to know if you are potentially affected? Here's the list of jurisdictions with such laws according to the email
Employee Pay-to-Play List
California (including immediate family)Denver, Colorado (including spouse and minor children)Connecticut (including spouse and dependent children 18 or over)Illinois (including spouse and, for contributions to the Comptroller - s Office and Treasurers Office, spouse and minor children)Kentucky (including spouse)MarylandMissouriNew Jersey (including spouse, civil union partner, and children residing in same residence)New MexicoNew York City, New YorkPennsylvania (including spouse and dependent children)Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (including spouse residing in same household, life partner, and minor dependent children)Rhode Island (including spouse and minor children)Dallas, TexasHouston, TexasSan Antonio, Texas (including spouse)VirginiaBoard Pay-to-Play List
Culver City, CaliforniaLos Angeles, CaliforniaPasadena, CaliforniaSan Francisco, CaliforniaDenver, Colorado (including spouse and minor children)Connecticut (including spouse and dependent children 18 or over)Illinois (including spouse and minor children)Cook County, IllinoisMarylandMissouriNew Jersey (including spouse, civil union partner, and children residing in same residence)New MexicoPennsylvania (including spouse and dependent children)Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (including spouse residing in same household, life partner, and minor dependent children)Rhode Island (including spouse and minor children)Dallas, TexasHouston, TexasVirginia