Service Insights Newsletter       Workshop Registration      Order Form      Site Search
Organizational Effectiveness Through Feedback Management

 >>  Survey Sample Selection:               

Review our
Synopsis of Articles
Read our latest article on
and see how a major company put little thought or effort into their survey questionnaire.
Receive our Newsletter
Email:
Survey Products
Survey Workshops
Learn how to conduct a survey project from questionnaire design
to survey administration
to data analysis.

Next Workshops
October 5-7, Washington DC
November 7-11, Dubai
February 2011, Phoenix
~~~
August 4 to 26,  2010
~~~
Learn how to design a
December 8-9, Kuala Lumpur
~~~
View a short online presentation
summarizing the concept of surveying and outlining our courses.
Bolton, Mass.
October 25-27, 2010
including our one-day
Survey Mentor Suite
Provides targeted assistance on your survey questionnaire and project while being mentored on good survey practices.  
        
Contract Holder GS-02F-0126U
Custom Survey Projects
Need more than
targeted survey consulting?  
Great Brook specializes in
the design and execution of
Custom Survey Research Projects to meet
your individual needs.
Voice of the Customer Audits
Get an expert's review of the feedback management processes in your organization for customers or other stakeholder groups --
or get a deep dive assessment of your survey program.
Service Strategy
Have a question about surveying you'd like to have answered in a future CLF article?  
Please contact us.  
Self-help guidance for your survey project
Private On-site Survey Workshops are available at your company.  This may prove more cost effective and deliver immediate value to your survey program as we build your survey instrument in class.  
Please contact us for details.  
Survey Tools
For a comprehensive list
of survey automation tools
for your survey program.
The Need to Consider Your
Whole Research Program
A counterintuitive result of a survey project is that a survey's results are likely to pose as many new questions as it answers.  An email to me recently posed a dilemma that can result from a particular approach to a survey program.  The company had conducted a survey and now they wanted to ask some follow-up questions based upon the learning from the first survey.  The question is: whom should they invite to take the survey?  
Do we send the survey to the same people again or do we contact the people who replied?  What is the best way. We didn't do sampling as we just sent the survey to every user.
Having attempted a census - sending an invitation to everyone -- this company runs the risk of creating “survey burnout” if they invite everyone again.  Customers will only give you so much time to help out your research efforts, and if you ask too much, you risk alienating them.  

This article is from our Service Insights Newsletter.  
Since surveying is frequently used for some quality control purposes, let draw a parallel to our manufacturing colleagues.  Frequently, to measure the quality of a tangible product coming off an assembly line, we have to destroy it to know the limits of performance.  (Think of those automobile crash test commercials.)  This is known as destructive testing since the tested product cannot be sold.  When conducting quality control surveys of our intangible service product, we don't want to engage in destructive testing, that is, burn out and annoy our customers!
So what's the solution?
The power of statistics means we probably do not need to attempt a census for any survey - unless your group of interest is very small.  In another article, I talked about response rate requirements and statistical confidence.  Surveying a sample will draw a reasonably accurate profile of how customers, or any other group of interest, feel about certain issues or operational practices.  The structure of a survey program that I recommend is to survey a sample, and then if a follow-up survey is desired, we can generate another random sample excluding those who previously responded without risking survey burnout.  
The questioner specifically asked about surveying just the respondents to the first survey.  I responded, “Surveying only the respondents [to the first survey] does introduce a bias to the results since your sample is not random.”  That bias may be fine if you're just looking for more detailed information and not trying to establish a profile of customer feelings or practices.  “If you're looking to develop more granular information about things learned from a previous survey, let me suggest not doing a survey, but, instead, conducting some in-depth research, e.g., interviews or focus groups.  These [surveys and focus groups] are complementary research techniques.” Don't feel that you are constrained to one research too.  In a previous article, I discussed ways you can generate more actionable data on a survey, but don't feel you cannot go beyond conducting surveys.  
The key lesson here is that you should think through the entire survey program before you conduct your first survey.  You could back yourself into a corner.  Over surveying your customers is certainly not recommended.  Remember, a survey's goal is to measure satisfaction, and how  the survey program is conducted will affect that very satisfaction.  A survey is a CRM transaction.  
-- Fred Van Bennekom, Dr.B.A., Principal Great Brook Consulting
Please contact us with feedback on this article or other topics that you might find interesting.
Click here to add your name to our Service Insights newsletter which highlights newly published articles.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
Great Brook Home   |   Products & Services   |   Events   |   Clients   |   Partners   |   Resources   |   News   |   About Great Brook   |   Contact Us   |   Site Search & Map
Copyright Great Brook Consulting, 2007.  All rights reserved.   Privacy Policy   Site Map